Boston AWP Conference

IMG_2440

Last week I traveled to Boston with my friend and fellow poet, Ethel Rackin, for the AWP Conference. It was exhausting but well worth it. AWP is an acronym for Association of Writers & Writing Programs, for those who may not know. I’d love to talk more about it, about the panels, and the beautiful books and impressive presses, and the amazing, heartfelt, talented people I was fortunate to spend some time with. But I don’t have time to write more at the moment. Instead, I’ll direct you to some photos I took while there. I only had my camera out for three events but there are a lot of pics for you to check out if you’re so inclined. Head over to my Flickr set here. 

Posted in Uncategorized

The Next Big Thing: Divya Victor

Here’s another really great interview from one of my favorites, Divya Victor, for The Next Big Thing. This is a chain “self-interview” wherein once you are tagged you answer the questions & in turn tag five more authors with books about to be (or recently) published. . . 

victor

What is the working title of the book?

Things To Do With Your Mouth is the title. Les Figues is the publisher.

Who or what inspired you to write this book?

Wailing and weeping make for a great spectacle, obviously. Oprah, Ricki, Maury, Montel, Jerry and the Vatican have all made great profits from them— especially women and children, please. We are these glassy lachrymatoria—our tear ducts are banks that weep out gold. Remember when the mourners at Kim Jong Il’s funerals were imprisoned for not crying sincerely enough? Tears for gold, asshole. Except, there was no gold. Tricked. Weepers should unionize.

Therefore, I’ve been thinking some about the increasingly obsolete practice of moirology— the practice of hiring professional mourners. If you were a rich person, you’d pay someone some money to come and wail and beat their chests at your favorite corpse—your dead father, your dead uncle, your landlord etc. There are women who are hired to cry, wail, and lament for dead strangers— the rudaali of India, the crying women of the Philippines, the carpideira of Brazil. But how they cry for strangers, how they take their tears from some unknown place and give them to some unknown person, how they repeat their performance everyday— and they do this for pay— is nice to think about. Moirologists are paid for their memorialization. The performance of mourning is purely professional– a product of practice. How might poetry resemble this work?

I enjoy thinking about affective labor that is entirely for purchase, for sale. It gives me immense pleasure to know that crocodile tears can be swapped for some kind of purchase in identity politics, post-colonial mourning, whatever gets you the job. Can the subaltern cry wolf and get away with it?

In other words, how much sincerity do you expect to get for an $18 SPD book?

Where did the idea come from for the book?

The idea for this book came from where all ideas come from– other people’s ideas. Tzara says that all thought begins in the mouth. Or, more accurately, in other people’s mouths.

I get all my ideas from the research I do for my own scholarship. From these ideas I excise of all the affects, histories, and narratives of my own everyday life and put them in a drawer for when my union will pay for psychoanalysis. The rest I make into poems as fast as possible.

That said, the specific notion from which this book emerged is historical. During the late Middle Ages, German-Jewish women who were accused of witchcraft and of eating children were hunted and executed by vigilantes who were afraid that their flesh would be devoured by women with excessive powers of speech and discourse. Before executing these women, the murdering fearful (“faithful”) would allow the accused woman to atone for her chatty, witchy, baby-eating ways if she told them a way to stop her dead comrades from eating flesh from their graves. The fear was that these women continued to have the use of their mouths even after they died. So, one accused woman suggested that they fill the corpse’s mouth with gravel as it laid in its grave. Another woman suggested that they drive a stake through the coffin, right through the corpse’s open maw, until it pierced the skull and went through, pinning the woman to the earth.

The fear of speaking women obviously has a very long history, but the resourcefulness that we’ve shown in silencing these women has not always been as metaphorical as it is now. Fleshy solutions were it. So, for poetry today to approach its feminist purpose, it must address the vocalizing and silenced mouth— it must reorganize the work of this opening. I therefore wanted to make a book that did this to the most minimal degree. The work of this book of poetry is to repeat, recant, and endlessly say again what has already been said. Because it can.  Because it doesn’t mind being a corpse with a mouth full of gravel.

What genre does your book fall under?

Labiomancy and Self Help? Possibly poetry.

What actors would you choose to play the part of your characters in a movie rendition?

The movie rendition of this book will probably be a scene by scene recreation of The Exorcist by Michael Haneke. All the drama of the social contract, none of the terrible pea soup vomit. No, I’m kidding. It will only be pea soup vomit. Sort of floating in its own abject electromagnetic field.  Therefore, I will probably cast Juliette Lewis to expel it and consume it over and over again.

What is the one sentence synopsis of your book?

The mouth of discourse and the mouth of silence are of one breath, one flesh.

How long did it take you to write the first draft of the manuscript?

As long as it takes to hire a professional mourner these days, but longer than it takes for them to be done crying at some stranger’s funeral and get paid. So, about a year.

What else about your book might pique the reader’s interest?

It contains specific instructions for committing infanticide as well as tips on how to make gags for your lover.

Will your book be self-published or represented by an agency?

Les Figues Press will release and curate the book’s life.

My tagged writers for next Wednesday are:

Jeremiah Rush Bowen

Holly Melgard

Shiv Kotecha

Julia Bloch

Joey Yearous Algozin

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Next Big Thing: Kevin Varrone

I recently tagged the very talented Philadelphia poet, Kevin Varrone, for The Next Big Thing – a chain self-interview for writers who have forthcoming or recently published books. Here are Kevin’s responses to the questions.

 

What is the working title of the book?

& all & all that rises

Where did the idea come from for the book?

The idea for the book came from a few different sources, most concretely, from reading Maggie Nelson’s Bluets and Kate Greenstreet’s The Last Four Things in quick succession. And thinking a lot about stammering as a kind of articulation (vs. a defect in articulation) and sound as a potent sense and source of memory.

What genre does your book fall under?

Poetry.

What actors would you choose to play the part of your characters in a movie rendition?

Ralph Macchio for the Wonder Years-esque voice-over narration. I don’t think there are any other characters!

What is the one sentence synopsis of your book?

You are what you hear and how you say.

How long did it take you to write the first draft of the manuscript?

The first (longish) poem in the manuscript, “stammer,” didn’t work that way, really. It came together in bits and pieces and fits and starts over 2 + years. The second longer-ish poem, “earshot,” took somewhere around 4 months for the first draft. There might be a common denominator in there somewhere, but that math is beyond me!

Who or what inspired you to write this book?

The books I mentioned in Question #2 inspired “earshot.” Also, a memory of being in a tree stand with my brother as a young kid, in the winter, in the morning, when it was still mostly dark and completely silent, and jumping from the tree stand after our father shot at a deer. “Stammer” was inspired by spending a lot of time around kids and just really loving the way they tend to speak; that, and the young son of a friend who was having some difficulty with a stammer. I was just thinking a lot about the relentless normalizing forces in the world and how they turn beautiful things in defects sometimes. I wanted to try to write something that went in the other direction. 

What else about your book might pique the reader’s interest?

Hmmm. Hard to say. Maybe that it’s a book that tries really hard to put the ear and hearing at the center of the poems (vs. sight). I was––am––really interested in the idea of a sound image. Of language transmitting meaning through sound as much through meaning (i.e., definitions of words). I like how emotion sound is, in a way that painting is emotional for me, or music: emotional without the filter of language and the meaning of words. 

Will your book be self-published or represented by an agency?

I’m not sure yet. I don’t anticipate self-publishing it in book form, though I increasingly like the idea of multi-dimensional electronic publications, such as 

http://www.limpencraft.com/

and

http://www.luminousairplanes.com/

 

My tagged writers for next Wednesday are: Sarah Blake, Sue Landers, Chris McCreary, C.E. Putnam, and Carlos Soto Roman

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Next Big Thing: me

I was recently tagged by the wonderful poet, Jenn McCreary last
week for the self-interview chain, The Next Big Thing. I, in turn, am tagging another five
poets, who have recently or are about to have their books published
in print, to continue the chain.

My triptych poetry book, Sky Journals, is going to be published in 2013 by Dusie Press. My turn with The Next Big Thing interview is over at The New Hive if you’d like to take a look.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Theatre Etc

I’ve been thinking so much these recent years about embodiment of one’s creative action & theatre. There’s both objectivity and subjectivity to be had during action, a zen, of both being and feeling. Or maybe it’s grace/fulness. & I’m talking about the action of authenticity (heart/intention), more than theatrical artifice. Seems it has something to do with the point of connection – empathy/[psychological]catharsis, a shared experience with other humans, maybe other creatures, maybe even inanimate objects if one wants to go that far. Like it’s somehow serving a sociobiological necessity – maybe it’s even a primal drive. Even if there’s no tangible audience but the possibility of an audience, or the perception of one in the creator’s mind. And then maybe it’s the sheer act of beauty, though that latter word is a can of worms.

I saw Carax’ film, Holy Motors, a few weeks ago & I think it addresses some of the same stuff I’ve been mulling.

When asked why he continues taking on ‘assignments’, Oscar answers, “The beauty of the act.” And follows it through – if beauty is in the eye of the beholder, what is left when there is no beholder? Later there’s an allusion to cameras so small that you can’t see them. The notion of an audience without a tangible audience.

I’m unsure what Oscar’s (or Carax’?) answer would be but I’m left with faith. Not trusting that there exists an audience, Omniscient or human, but maybe the action, the perception of the action by its creator, holds a value high enough to influence an objective reality – and maybe the notion of an audience increases that value. Sound familiar? The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics. My translation: it is the act of observing (measurement) that makes something so. And maybe, too, for the thing in action, the perception of being observed.

Since I’ve been working on the BRUT project, the idea(s) of theatre has become paramount to me. With performances, I’m aware that the work can be obnoxious, intense or dark. A lovely poet came up to me after I performed a piece in August and said he remembered me reading from the BRUT work at St. Mark’s in NYC seven or eight years ago. “It scared the crap out of me.” I’m ambivalent about that response. Before reading one of my character’s letters at a performance in Philadelphia this past year, I printed on a sheet of paper and taped it to the podium. It began “This is the theatre of our dreams…” And in a line from the poem, Mincemeat, “I mean the innocuousness of theatre.” It’s okay, we’re all safe here.

And that’s just the right irony, right. The theatre’s safety of innocuous expression is perhaps the thing that allows transformation of the individual, maybe even an audience, maybe further – a culture.

Yesterday I was so happy to read this from the director, Arthur Penn:

The primary challenges of the theatre should not always be getting people to give a shit
about it. The primary challenge should be to produce plays that reach out to people and
change their lives. Theatre is not an event, like a hayride or a junior prom–it’s an artistic, emotional experience in which people who have privately worked out their stories share them with a group of people who are, without their knowledge, their friends, their peers, their equals, their partners on a remarkable ride. 

Of course, Theatre can be in any moment, any venue or non-venue, as the beholder imagines. Since a young age, I’ve been aware of a daily sense of cinema; now I understand it as the same. I could ramble on much longer but I’ll leave it here for now. In any case, I just put up a little intro to BRUT over at The New Hive. Please feel free to check it out. 

h

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Surge

Here’s one of the pieces I read/performed at the Boston Poetry Festival in August, for those who inquired. It comes from the larger work of Ta Ming. The video is my original footage & audio mix.

Image

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , ,

Tragicon Spectacle: Theory of the Theatre of the Poet

Here’s the piece I read at Jack Krick’s Salon in July.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Reading Event in Boston Next Weekend (Aug 17-19, 2012)

I’m looking forward to reading at this event & even more excited about listening & meeting some very talented poet-people. . .

**

Coming up on August 17 – 19 at Outpost 186 is the Dog Day Poetry Marathoon put on by the wonderful folks over at the Boston Poetry Collective.
186 ½ Hampshire St.
Inman Sq., Cambridge

Friday: 7:00 – 10:00pm
Saturday: 1:00 – 5:00pm & 7:00 – 10:00pm
Sunday: 1:00 – 4:00pm

Featuring readings by:

Aaron Kiely, Aaron Tieger, Allen Bramhall, Amanda Cook, Anna Deeny, Anna Moschovakis, Anthony Cuellar, Ben McFall, Betsy Wheeler, Brenda Iijima, Bridget Madden, Carol Mirakove, Cheryl Clark Vermeulen, Chuck Stebelton, David Rich, Dayana Fraile, Dorothea Lasky, Edmund Berrigan, Eileen Myles, Emily Spiegelman, Erica Kaufman, Farrah Field, G.L. Ford, Gerrit Lansing, Gilmore Tamny, Hassen Saker, Ish Klein, Jacqueline Waters, James Cook, Janaka Stucky, January O’Neil, Jen Benka, Jenny Zhang, Jess Mynes, Jessica Fiorini, Jim Behrle, Joel Sloman, John Coletti, John Mulrooney, Jordan Davis, Karen Weiser, Kimberly Lyons, Kythe Heller, Leopoldine Core, Lori Lubeski, Mairead Byrne, Maria Damon, Mark Lamoureux, Michael Carr, Michael Franco, Patrick Doud, Rachel Sachs Steele, Ryan Gallagher, Sean Cole, Simone White, Susan Landers, Susanna Gardner, Suzanne Mercury, Thom Donovan, Tracey McTague

Also throughout the Marathoon talks will be presented by:

Brendan Lorber: On Ruin & Desire
Carol Weston: On Stephen Jonas
Douglas Rothschild: On how great he is
Ethan Fugate: On Bike-Commute Photography Poetics
Filip Marinovich: On the Poetics of Initiation At Brooks School in North Andover
Guillermo Parra: On Jose Antonio Ramos Sucre
Jack Kimball: On Don Quatrale, Rene Ricard & Billy Barnum
Jim Dunn: On Harry Crosby
Marcella Durand: On translating Baudelaire & Proust poems
Nathaniel Otting: On editing minutes BOOKS
Rachel Levitsky: On the Office of Recuperative Strategies
Ruth Lepson: On Alberto de Lacerda
Zachary Bos: On L.E. Sissman

Please join us.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

Sky Journals Update

I’m excited to announce that the kickass Dusie Press is going to publish my Sky Journals triptych in one volume. If all goes as planned, it should be out sometime in the earlier part of 2013.

Please be sure to buy their books on the SPD (Small Press Distribution) site to show your support – and enrich your life with reading the quality poetry they publish.

* *

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

My Little Transmedia Playground

When I was at the ContactCon last fall in NY, I met Zach Verdin, CEO of TheNewHive.com & he told me about the innovative site they had put together. It took me awhile to give myself permission to go play there. I’m finding that it’s the perfect place for me to f/tool around a little with an idea in a way that’s more suited to how my brain works and  to the creative work I generally do, anyway. Here, I can do it in small bits. Also, maybe it gives a person who might be interested in my transmedia poetry a better idea of what it’s all about, since the conceptual notions within my poems and poetry projects are difficult to communicate by word allusion alone. It’s like trying to figure out if people have enough information to get a joke, and if not, how do you communicate that information in the joke without destroying it?

I’d urge anyone reading this to check it out and request joining their beta version. If you’re looking to invest some $ in something truly inspiring and brilliant, definitely connect with Zach as they are likely still looking for investors.

TheNewHive is not just a place to express your ideas and creativity but it’s also a social network connecting members. Every week the folks that run it give us an idea to play with and, if we decide to make an expression, we tag it with that theme. This week’s theme was #colors so I posted an older poem about the Blue Morpho butterly, along with a video of St. Vincent. Click on the photo to go to that ‘expression’ over at TheNewHive.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment